My favorite tool for this process is "Darken/Lighten Center" in Color Efex Pro 4. The young female student still stands out, but the camera rendered all the tones more evenly than I wanted. So in post production I subtly enhanced the tones to help draw the viewer's eye to her. Highlighted Student - I took this photo because of the girl in the crowd looking off. And here's a bit more about that process. When I snap the shutter, I know that I'm probably going to emphasize that person further in post production. For example, with a crowd of people, there may be a face looking off in a different direction. I'm attracted to many pictures because something stands out in the composition. You can share your thoughts at the TDS Facebook page, where I'll post this story for discussion. Tons of free content about how to get the most out of Aperture. Also, take a look at our Aperture 3 Learning Center. To learn more about Aperture, check out my Aperture 3.3 Essential Training (2012) on. Photos for OS X will prepare the converted library for you and place the container in the same directory as the original library.Click on the Library you want to convert, then click on the Choose Library button.Look for the Library you want to convert in the Choose Library dialog box.Hold down the Option key and relaunch the Photos application.Quit Photos for OS X and make sure Aperture and iPhoto are closed too.However, if you want to practice converting an iPhoto or Aperture Library, here are the steps. There's an advanced technique that's really a workaround, but I haven't tested it enough to write about at this time. There is no easy way to merge the Converted Library with the existing System Library. If you want to test this feature, I recommend that you use a small library that will allow you to practice the ins and outs of this procedure without processing gigabytes of information. Launching Photos with the Option key pressed presents you with a dialog box similar to this. You can switch back and forth between the System Library and the Converted Library by relaunching Photos for OS X while holding down the Option key. The Converted Library might be best considered a special project that's its own container. The System Library is the default Library that also communicates with iCloud services and allows you to share images across devices. Keep in mind that the converted Photos library is different than your Photos System Library that's located in your Pictures folder. Photos will create its own version of the library, leaving the original Aperture or iPhoto library intact (as shown above). By doing so, you can switch to a new library or convert an existing iPhoto or Aperture library. ![]() Rather, you close the Photos app, then relaunch holding down the Option key. The command to do so isn't part of the Photos for OS X menu system. I do, of course, have Olympus Viewer 3, but the slowness and general cumbersomeness make using it daunting.You can open your current Aperture or iPhoto libraries in Photos for OS X. I've recently downloaded Capture One Pro 8 and, though I've only done a small sample comparison, I can see definite differences (not all in favor of Capture One, though most show superior converted images). I further suspect that companies like Adobe pay less attention to less popular cameras - including MFT in general and perhaps the E-M1 in particular (though by all accounts they've even dissed the Fuji line way more). I recognize that different companies likely focus more on certain cameras than others, and that this likely results in differences in the rendered image qualities. Having seen Robin Wong's fantastic work, which apparently are very lightly PP'd using only Olympus Viewer 3, I feel that the RAW processor used may account for at least some of my dissatisfaction (yes, I realize that quality photos come primarily from the photographer, not the equipment and not PP). The shortfall from what I expected varies considerably, depending on the image, but by and large the end results seem somewhat flat, especially compared to some of the images I've seen elsewhere. True, I can achieve pretty decent renderings, depending on the RAW image, though I frequently have to boost saturation, contrast and perhaps clarity a bit, but by and large they seem to come out a bit lackluster and less than compelling. I've had my E-M1 for nearly a year, and while very pleased with the camera and the photos I've taken, I'm reluctantly coming to the conclusion that Lightroom (currently 5.6) RAW processed images are falling short of what the camera can do.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |